Blog: Department Of Interior Takes Steps To Update Offshore Wind … – Mondaq

United States:

Department Of Interior Takes Steps To Update Offshore Wind Regulatory Scheme

25 January 2023

Liskow & Lewis

To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on

In advance of holding an offshore wind lease sale in the Gulf of
Mexico, which is expected this summer, the Department of Interior
recently took several steps to update the offshore wind regulatory
framework. First, Interior issued a Final Rule, which reassigns the
responsibilities for certain regulations governing offshore wind
from BOEM to BSEE. This reassignment aligns the wind regulatory
process more closely with the oil and gas framework in terms of the
division of responsibility between the two sub-agencies. Second,
Interior issued a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking proposing several
key changes to the agency’s current offshore wind regulations.
The proposed rule seeks to streamline certain aspects of the site
assessment and development process and implement other changes
related to lease issuance, financial assurance, safety management
systems, and other matters.

The reassignment of responsibilities from BOEM to BSEE will take
effect once the final rule is published in the Federal Register.
Public comments on the proposed substantive changes are due within
60 days of publication of the proposed rule in the Federal
Register. The following summarizes key components of these
regulatory actions:

Reassignment of Responsibilities

Under the final rule, BOEM retains the authority to identify the
areas that may be leased for offshore development, to issue and
administer leases and other grants, to review and approve
Construction and Operations Plans and Site Assessment Plans, and to
require payments and financial assurance. The regulations
transferred to BSEE include those governing the oversight of
facility design, fabrication, and installation. BSEE would also
review safety management systems and oil spill response plans. In
addition, BSEE would have the authority to enforce compliance with
safety and environmental regulations through the issuance of
noncompliance notices, cessation orders, and civil penalties.
Finally, BSEE will also oversee decommissioning activities.

Proposed Changes to the Regulatory Framework

Proposed changes to the wind energy regulatory framework include
the following:

  • Streamlining approval for deployment of meteorological
    (“met”) buoys during site assessment:
    deployment of floating met buoys to determine baseline ocean
    conditions (as opposed to the installation of met towers that
    anchor to the seafloor) has become the industry standard for
    conducting site assessment activities. BOEM has determined that the
    potential environmental effects caused by met buoys during site
    assessment is minimal. Moreover, the deployment of these buoys is
    subject to regulation by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, which
    regulatory process is largely duplicative of the BOEM process. As a
    result, the proposed rule eliminates BOEM’s requirement that a
    Site Assessment Plan (“SAP”) be approved prior to the
    deployment of met buoys for site assessment purposes. BOEM
    anticipates that this change would eliminate the SAP requirement
    for nearly all future development of OCS renewable energy.
  • Increasing the flexibility of survey
    Before construction of the proposed project can
    begin, BOEM’s current regulations require that commercial
    lessees submit a Construction and Operations Plan (“COP”)
    containing survey data that characterizes both the seabed and
    sub-seabed that will be disturbed. This effectively requires
    completion of not only geophysical surveys, but also geotechnical
    surveys, including in situ boring and sampling at
    foundation locations, prior to COP submission. Under the
    proposed rule, lessees could strike their own balance between
    geophysical and geotechnical surveys conducted at the COP stage, as
    long as BOEM deems the data provided is sufficient to define the
    baseline geological conditions of the seabed; develop a geologic
    model; assess geologic hazards; and determine the feasibility of
    the proposed site. Moreover, a more flexible survey timeline would
    allow the use of project design envelopes (“PDEs”) in COP
    submissions. The use of PDEs allows lessees and grant holders to
    propose a range of design parameters for construction and operation
    activities thereby providing more flexibility throughout the
    permitting process while still complying with NEPA and other
    statutory obligations.
  • Modifying installation verifications and project design
    Lessees are required to use a Certified
    Verification Agent (“CVA”) to provide an independent
    third-party review of Facility Design Reports (“FDRs”)
    and Fabrication and Installation Reports (“FIRs”). The
    proposed rule would allow companies to submit separate FDRs and
    FIRs for each major project component, subject to CVA approval that
    the major components will function together in an integrated
    manner. This change would thereby allow lessees to begin
    fabricating and installing certain approved facility components
    while other components are receiving separate CVA verification.
    Additionally, the proposal would reduce the number of components
    that are considered “fabricated” (as opposed to
    “procured”) and clarify that fabrication activities that
    do not take place on the OCS can commence before the submittal of
    the FDR, FIR, or any required plans.
  • Establishing a Renewable Energy Leasing
    Currently, BOEM announces offshore renewable
    lease sales individually. The proposed rule would require the
    publication of a five-year schedule detailing the OCS renewable
    energy leases being considered by BOEM. The schedule would differ
    from the Oil and Gas Five-Year Leasing Program in that the schedule
    would not have requirements for public comment periods and would
    not constitute final agency action. As a proposed schedule, BOEM
    would not be obligated to offer all sales on the schedule; BOEM
    could adjust the schedule as necessary through published
  • Changes to BOEM’s renewable energy auction and
    lease issuance procedures:
    The proposed rule would
    introduce a new term of “provisional winner” to describe
    the bidder that BOEM determines has submitted the winning bid at
    the close of the auction. The provisional bidder would then become
    the “winning bidder” pending favorable completion of the
    government’s post-auction reviews. The proposal also gives BOEM
    clear authority to award a lease to the next highest bidder in the
    event the provisional winner fails to ultimately sign the lease,
    provide the required amount of financial assurance, or tender the
    outstanding bid balance. In addition, under the proposed rule, BOEM
    would continue the use of bidding credits and multiple factor
    auctions. BOEM seeks comments on whether these bidding methods are
    effective mechanisms of advancing priorities such as promoting
    workforce development and supply chain enhancement, consistent with
    the goals of OCSLA.
  • Changes to financial assurance
    The proposed rule would eliminate the
    supplemental financial assurance currently required before COP
    approval, simplify the requirements for financial assurance during
    the early stages of a commercial lease, and provide more options
    for the financial assurance instruments that BOEM may accept. In
    addition, while current regulations require full funding of
    decommissioning accounts for each renewable energy facility’s
    installation, the proposed rule would allow incremental funding of
    decommissioning accounts during the operations term of a lease.
    Finally, BOEM also seeks comment on various aspects of the
    financial assurance framework, including whether BOEM should
    explicitly rely on the financial strength and reliability of other
    jointly and severally liable parties—including any current or
    predecessor lessees and grant holders, or co-lessees and co-grant
    holders—when determining the need for, and amount of,
    financial assurance necessary to cover accrued obligations.
  • Supplementing safety management system
    (“SMS”) regulations:
    The proposed rule would add
    additional clarity concerning the types of information that the
    agency considers necessary in an SMS and would incentivize (through
    streamlined oversight) SMS certification from a recognized
    accreditation organization. The proposed rule would also require
    the submittal of an annual summary detailing how the SMS performed
    and the submittal of a triannual report summarizing the results of
    the most recent SMS audit, the corrective actions implemented, and
    a description of any changes made to the SMS since the prior
  • Revising lease terms and clarifying BOEM’s
    authority to issue civil penalties:
    The proposed rule
    would amend the default lease terms currently in place by merging
    the existing preliminary and site assessment terms into one
    preliminary period, establishing new lease periods for COP review
    and for design and construction that can vary in length, and
    converting the existing 25-year operations term that commences at
    COP approval into a 30-year operations period commencing at the
    commercial operations date. The rule would also explicitly allow
    BOEM to assess immediate civil penalties in the renewable energy
    context for violations that constitute a threat of serious,
    irreparable, or immediate harm or damage to life, property, or the
    marine, coastal, or human environment, without notice and an
    opportunity to correct.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general
guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought
about your specific circumstances.

POPULAR ARTICLES ON: Energy and Natural Resources from United States

Notable US Carbon Capture And Storage Projects

Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP

At least 78 new US carbon capture and storage (CCS) projects were announced between 2021 and 2022, signifying a historic inflection point for CCS projects.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s